MI: Sex offender registry update passes state Senate

Source: wemu.org 6/18/25

The Michigan Senate voted Tuesday to update the state’s sex offender registry laws to comply with a recent federal court ruling.

The decision blocked increased reporting requirements for people convicted before new, tougher laws took effect. The court also declared unconstitutional a provision that allowed the state police to decide if an out-of-state crime warranted reporting.

Senate Majority Leader Winnie Brinks (D-Grand Rapids) said that part created a loophole for out-of-state offenders.

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify or abbreviate their name. 
  24. Please check for typos, spelling, punctuation, and grammar errors before submitting.  Comments that have many errors will not be approved. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

32 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Michigan needs to drop the registry in it’s entirety. They will never pass a law that passes constitutional muster.

Let the Games Begin ! 😎

This has been in constant legal battles for years and probably will come up again. Here’s an idea Michigan, Get rid of the registry and problems you created will be solved.

It’s frustrating that even in an NPR outlet broadcast from a college near one of the most liberal cities in America that we can’t get a single positive word said about us. In a country where so many people talk about “fascism” and study fascism and repeat the “First they came for the …” mantra ad nauseam it seems no one can spot that WE are the untouchables. In psychology, there is something known as the “better-than-average-effect” (BTAE), where most people think they are better than average at a lot of things. This includes moral bravery—a recent study showed that people think they would resist social and government pressure to do immoral things better than the average person. Obviously, that can’t be true, and it shows that, despite knowing the dangers of fascism, in all likelihood most people would end up going along with it because social pressure is far stronger than we think.

What the legislature is overlooking in Michigan is by putting more and more people on the registry they are expanding the number of opponents to the registry. Both Detroit and Flint have over 1% of their population on the registry. In Saginaw, nearly 2% of the population is on the registry. It’s only a matter of time before there are enough registrants in these cities to form a voting block.

Consider using Grok if u r doing pro se appeals or filing a habeas corpus or 6.500 motion. Tell Grok all the facts and exact wording of the felony information (minus your personal info)…give the jury instructions such as MI JI 38.10

Grok is worth about 150,00 attorneys and paralegals plus its FREE !

Example of a Grok conclusion in regards to using a computer with a decoy on the other end:
mcl 750.145c2 & 145d2f
Does the attempt provision of c2 require the knowledge element ? YES!
Because the knowledge element follows the list of prohibited conduct .

Since the predicate crime fails the computer crime collapses and fails also.
d2f :” if the underlying crime is a felony….”

People v Thousand is a crock of b.s….the impossibility doctrine blathering doesn’t touch the knowledge element !

Mich Ct of Appeals gaslighting…as usual.

They are liable for hundreds of fraudulent prosecutions…

Billions in damages are owed to their victims ! They will fight the law but they can’t beat this one .

A Class Action lawsuit with payouts per each victim in the multi-millions especially if forced onto the heartless lawless registry.

Good news. 6th Appeals has ruled Pre-2011 registrants are not part of the stay (Goldsmith Ruling) Check it out
John Doe A v. Gretchen Whitmer, 25-1413 – CourtListener.com

Good news! Now on to California: No moving people from no-posts to tier 3 25 years after the fact.